Risk Assessment Methods You’ve Never Heard Of - But Need to Start Using
Risk assessment costs nothing if you do it right. And everything if you do it wrong.
When it comes to managing projects, identifying risks is crucial for ensuring success. Yet, many project managers stick to familiar techniques and miss out on more advanced methods that could provide deeper insights into potential challenges.
As someone who's been in the trenches of project management, I've found that the more tools you have in your risk management arsenal, the better equipped you are to navigate the complexities of any project.
Here are some lesser-known risk identification techniques that you might not have heard of, but which can be incredibly valuable in your projects.
Assumption Analysis
Every project is built on a set of assumptions. These might include the availability of resources, the stability of market conditions, or the accuracy of client requirements. But what happens when those assumptions don't hold true? Assumption Analysis is all about critically evaluating these foundational beliefs.
To use this technique, start by listing all the assumptions underpinning your project.
Then, consider what would happen if each one turned out to be false.
For instance, if you assume that a particular resource will be available throughout the project but it suddenly becomes scarce, what risks does that introduce? By challenging these assumptions early on, you can identify potential risks related to unexpected changes or unmet expectations.
Premortem Analysis: Imagining Failure to Prevent It
A premortem analysis flips the script on traditional risk assessment.
Instead of analyzing a project after it has failed (a postmortem), you imagine that the project has already failed and work backward to identify what could have gone wrong.
This method is incredibly effective at uncovering risks that might otherwise go unnoticed.
To conduct a premortem, gather your team and announce that the project has failed. Ask each team member to describe what went wrong.
This exercise not only encourages creative thinking but also surfaces risks that might not be considered in a more traditional risk assessment process. It’s a proactive way to strengthen your project’s defences against failure.
Future Wheel Analysis: Mapping the Ripple Effects
Have you ever considered the cascading effects of a decision or event within your project?
Future Wheel Analysis helps you do just that. This technique is designed to explore not just the immediate risks but also the secondary and tertiary effects that could arise from a particular event.
Start by identifying a central event—this could be a key decision or an external change. Draw a circle around it, then add spokes radiating out to represent the immediate consequences.
From each of these, draw further spokes to represent secondary and tertiary effects. This visual map can reveal cascading risks that might not be immediately obvious, helping you prepare for a broader range of potential challenges.
Cause-and-Effect (Fishbone) Diagram
Sometimes, the key to identifying risks lies in understanding their root causes. The Cause-and-Effect Diagram, also known as the Fishbone or Ishikawa diagram, is a visual tool that helps you systematically consider various factors that could lead to risks.
To create a Fishbone diagram, start by identifying the main risk and placing it at the head of the fish. Then, draw branches representing different categories of potential causes, such as people, processes, technology, and environment.
Drill down into each category to uncover specific risks.
This method is particularly useful when you need to identify risks that are deeply embedded in the project's structure or processes.
Constraint Analysis: Examining the Boundaries
Every project is bound by certain constraints. Constraints are the limitations within which the project must operate.
Constraint Analysis is a technique that focuses on identifying risks by examining these constraints closely.
To apply this method, list all the constraints associated with your project. Then, evaluate the potential risks if a constraint is more restrictive than anticipated. This approach helps you spot risks that might arise from incorrect planning parameters, ensuring that you're not caught off guard by limitations or unexpected changes.
Scenario Analysis: Exploring the "What Ifs"
What if everything goes wrong? Or right?
Scenario Analysis is about creating and exploring different scenarios that could occur during your project.
By examining how these scenarios could unfold, you can identify potential risks and plan accordingly.
Develop multiple scenarios, including best-case, worst-case, and most likely outcomes.
Analyze the risks associated with each one, particularly focusing on unexpected events or external factors that could disrupt your project.
This method not only prepares you for a range of possibilities but also helps in developing more robust contingency plans.
Heuristic Analysis
There's something to be said for intuition and experience.
Heuristic Analysis leverages the knowledge of experienced team members to identify risks based on their past experiences.
It’s a technique rooted in the idea that those who have been through similar projects can foresee potential issues more clearly.
To use Heuristic Analysis, gather your most experienced team members and ask them to draw on their past experiences to identify risks.
Encourage them to think about similar projects and the challenges they faced. This approach taps into the collective wisdom of your team, bringing valuable insights that might not be obvious through more formal methods.
Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS)
Similar to a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) organizes risks into categories and subcategories, creating a hierarchical representation. This is similar to the Fishbone Diagram we created earlier. This technique ensures that no area is overlooked when identifying risks.
Start by developing a hierarchical structure that categorizes risks into groups such as technical, organizational, external, and project management risks. Drill down into each category to identify specific risks, ensuring a comprehensive view of potential threats.
A RBS is a powerful tool for ensuring that you have a complete and organized understanding of all possible risks.
Conclusion
These techniques might not be as widely known as the more traditional methods, but they can provide a fresh perspective and deeper insights into the potential risks lurking within your projects. By incorporating these approaches into your risk management process, you'll be better prepared to anticipate and mitigate challenges, leading to more successful project outcomes.
Our new course, “Running Projects as a Remote Project Manager” transforms you into a remote project leader.
Learn the skills you won't find in any textbook.
Join the free waitlist by clicking the link above.
See you inside!
It's tempting to start a project with happy ears, but beginning with a general sense of skepticism and a "dab of paranoia" can work magic at setting everyone up for success.
I really enjoyed this conversation about lesser-known risk techniques. In my experience, the biggest blocker to using these is not complexity, but habit. Teams default to the same risk register workshop every time, even when they know it is too shallow.